On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:44:40 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:29:32 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 12/7/10 5:16 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:52:10 -0500, wrote:

On 12/7/10 4:48 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:01:46 -0500, wrote:

On 12/7/10 3:30 PM, John H wrote:

Why don't you apologize for some of your more vile activities and see if that
has any effect?

I'm behaving reasonably well in here, and am not engaging in any vile
activities. My apologizing isn't going to stop the abhorrent behavior of
the half dozen or so assholes on your side of the fence whose current
behavior is disruptive. You know it and I know it.

You're reaping the harvest of what you sowed. Your calling those whom you've
treated the worst 'assholes', as though that's going to stop the behavior.

Try an apology. Who knows, it may work.

I've done it several times here. I'm still alive.


John, the "worst assholes" have decided they'd rather continuously trash
this newsgroup than behave reasonably. My "apologizing" isn't going to
change their behavior.

Do you really think I need to apologize to flajim, loogy and scotty?


Absolutely. They were the brunt of some of your most vile crap. And your worst
is what led Donnie, jps, slammer, et al, to jump on the bandwagon.


Well, I don't think such an apology will stop "Ziggy," the Harry
spoofer, or CrotchRot, whether they are one person or three, and whether
they are flajim, loogy and scotty.

Besides, I've seen nothing to indicate these boys will stop trashing
this newsgroup. Nothing at all. They never stopped and they never will.
Their impact isn't on me, but I know for sure it chases off newbies. Who
wants to post in the ****pot they've made of this place recently?



The purpose of an apology should not be to 'get' something in return.

An apology is suppose to be a step to resolve conflicts. Do you really
imagine that this is going to have the desired effect? Let's say it
will. Why shouldn't they apologize for all the crap they've said to
anyone and everyone who disagrees with them?

I don't see you stomping on Larry or the spoofers for continuing their
bs games. Why aren't you after them to apologize?