On 12/6/10 5:31 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:58:27 -0500, wrote:

On 12/6/10 4:56 PM, John H wrote:
On Dec 5, 1:15 pm, wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 12:45:03 -0500, John
wrote:

Maybe you should have simply read the title of the vid and not watched. Gosh,
think of all the heartburn you'd have avoided.

John, I understand perfectly well the thrill of watching a big fish
rise to a well cast bait, take the hook, run with it, jump around and
make big splashing noises. There's really nothing quite like it,
especially this time of year when the fish are hungry and the
opportunities ample.

Nicely done. Things were kind of slow around here for a while.

To have considered that non-religious post 'bait', the fish must have
been either starving for something (attention?) or just plain stupid.


Perhaps you'll grace us with a post of someone reciting the lord's
prayer and then try to convince those who are capable of thinking that
doing so was not "religious."


I would think a recitation of The Lord's Prayer as a religious activity.

Don't you normally capitalize the title of a work?


sometimes i do, sometimes I don't. it's a little silly and presumptuous,
by the way, to call that prayer "the lord's prayer," since no one has
ever met "the lord," or can even prove there is one, or, is there is
one, whether he or she would appreciate or even accept such a prayer.

if i were the lord, i'd be reciting a prayer that said, "thank me for
finishing with *that* planet in seven days so i could move on to a
planet with more worthy inhabitants."