"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article m,
says...

"W1TEF" wrote in message
...

On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:45:51 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 11/10/10 6:23 AM, W1TEF wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:20:02 -0500, wrote:

Pentagon can't explain 'missile' off California

That's because it's not a missile - it's a contrail.

http://uncinus.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/4/

Maybe.

No maybe about it.

Not to mention a contrail from a jet usually spreads out a ways behind
the aircraft. The front of the trail is usually thin until the wind
spreads it... This trail was thick right off the ass of the missile, and
make no mistake, it was a missile, as it headed west downrange... oh,
and they know what it was too...

Did you read the freakin' article Scott?

Unmentioned in this whole thing is that nobody HEARD anything. If a
missile supposedly as large as this one supposedly was (ICBM), you
would have heard it - even from 35 miles away. Those things aren't
quiet.
---------
If you're upwind you probably wouldn't hear it, especially in a place
with a
lot of noise pollution.

Read the article... Saw dozens of reports, experts "on both sides" and I
believe myself it was "message" from some axis power saying "see, we can
sit in your back yard and you didn't even know we were there". That's
why it went due west.

Fact is, every single airliner is tracked to the inch by the second. If
there was a flight there someone would be able to say "this was flight
such and such" here is it's flight path... But they can't, there was no
plane...

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - Pain is temporary, Glory is forever!

mmmm.................... whoooo whoooo!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-b5aW08ivHU