BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

On 14 Sep 2003 10:32:20 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message
Just because you're too stupid to understand english doesn't mean I'm a
liar. Are you really that moronic to understand that someone can be
guilt of neglect and more than just neglect at the same time? You said
you could show somewhere that I said I was NOT guilty of neglect. You
haven't done that yet. All you've done is to show where I said I was
indeed guilty of neglect and more than neglect. So you still owe me an
apology.

You are just too ****ing stupid to be shown ANYTHING. You said "it was
more than neglect." Now, are you really so dumb that you think
"neglect" and "more than neglect" mean the same thing?

Man are you an idiot. You really can't be an engineer because then you
would know something about set theory. It's obvious you don't know a
thing about it if you think that someone first saying they were guilty
of neglect and then adding they were also guilty of more than neglect
means they were lying when they said they were guilty of neglect.

You still owe me an apology because you haven't yet shown where I said I
*wasn't* guilty of neglect, like you claimed you could. You really
can't be so stupid as to think that being guilty of neglect and more
than neglect means the same thing as not being guilty of neglect. Can
you? Well, I guess you can be that stupid. You've proved you are over
and over again. This is just another fine example.

At some point I think we're going to have to recap all of your
stupidity again. That's always fun.

Steve