YukonBound wrote:


"Califbill" wrote in message
...


"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was
antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North
Carolina
family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black.
Imagine that.

didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more
important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves


And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the
states telling
the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states.

so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed.

no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property


You dumb F@ck. You state the war was about slavery. It was about
economics and states rights. Even Lincoln stated he would not free
the slaves if it saved the Union. You are a racist of the first
order. Anybody saying anything about Obama that is negative, you run
to the racist rant. F@uk you. You are an idiot and will always be
stupid and broke. When Obama or the next Administration decides to
raise taxes on the "rich", I will laugh my ass off, when you find out
you and the wife are rich. And my great Grandfather was wounded
fighting as an Ohio Regular. Fought on the side of the Union. You
probably do not even know a person of color, any color, as a friend.

Swill...lay off the sauce so early in the morning.
In one sentence you say he... "will always be stupid and broke"
and in the next you say "you find out you and the wife are rich".
Which is it?
Why are you commenting on that discussion? Bored _and_ dumb?