wrote in message
...
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:32:00 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:
wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 02:12:11 -0400, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:41:03 -0400, wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:00:40 -0400, bpuharic wrote:
No wonder they hate us there.
who gives a **** if they hate us. if they leave us alone that's
enough.
They are more likely to screw with us if we are screwing with them.
we arent screwing with them. afghanistan attacked us. that has some
consequences. just ask the japanese.
Afghanistan never attacked us. That is as valid as the WMD argument
... from the same guy, your hero GW Bush.
The Taliban were in control of the country. They supported and protected
bin
laden. We asked them to hand him over. They refused. He had killed 1000s
of
our people. And, your response is... do nothing. At least Bush initially
went after bin laden.
... but Bin Laden is not there now.
What part of that is so hard for you to understand. Have we demanded
Pakistan turn over Bin Laden? Have we occupied Islamabad to force them
to?
Why not if your logic is solid?
So, if we leave and he comes back, which would be fairly likely, then what?
Are we pressuring Pakistan to do more in the wild, border areas?