wrote in message
...
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:24:04 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:57:49 -0700, jps wrote:

They will be presidents with no nation changing accomplishments and
each have one interesting anecdote. Bush will be remembere\d for Bush
v Gore and Clinton will be remembered as being the second president to
be impeached, with the blow jobs being the snicker factor that makes
it memorable.

Golly, I don't recall Clinton attempting to bankrupt the country apart
from his support of globalism.

He didn't obsessively pursue spending us into oblivion.

I can't defend Bush and Obama spending a trillion each on useless
wars.

Unfortunately nobody remembers money you didn't spend.

Obama hasn't spent nor will he spend a trillion in either place or both.

Last I checked, Congress writes the checks, btw.


Oh you are going to use the Pentagon numbers now. When it was Bush's
war you used the most circumspect projections the DNC could come up
with to get to his trillion.

Obama has only been there 20 months, let's project that out several
more years before we say how expensive it will be.
Iraq is far from over and they are still surging in Afghanistan

I never used any Pentagon numbers or any specific agency. Obama won't be
spending a trillion in either place. We're supposed to be drawing down in
Iraq, and Afg. isn't far behind. Sorry, but that's just hysterical nonsense.