posted to rec.boats
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,005
|
|
battery charger out
On Oct 4, 1:27*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Oct 3, 10:57 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message
....
On Oct 2, 1:50 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Califbill" wrote in message
news:qqmdnWS9CeH_8zrRnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@earthlink. com...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Califbill" wrote in message
news:5LednbXEeaPa2zvRnZ2dnUVZ_qmdnZ2d@earthlink. com...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Califbill" wrote in message
news:Bv2dnQYJC5H27DjRnZ2dnUVZ_qednZ2d@earthlin k.com...
"bpuharic" wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 05:01:30 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:
On Sep 29, 11:48 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:08:55 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:
Obama and his administration is training IT professionals in
other
countries,
to the tune of 16M.
the GDP of the US is 14 trillion
That's 16 million in TRAINING. *Has nothing to do with GDP,
idiot.
hey bozo. where do you think the money came from?
FOREIGN AID you IDIOT!
Except that BO is shipping more jobs overseas. *Why would he do
that?
sorry. the GOP just voted to give big tax breaks to companies
that
do
that
Meanwhile, the GOP is not in control of congress... the dems
are.
wrong. ever hear of a filibuster?
Once again, a filibuster has nothing to do with who controls
congress,
wrong. tell me how the dems can repeal a tax break when the GOP
wont
let it happen, OK?
idiot. *The dem's control just isn't filibuster proof anymore.
Soon
they won't have control, either.
wrong. no one's predicting they'll l ose the senate
you DO know the US congress is bicameral, right?
oh. you didnt
Foreign aid? *Why give it to a country that will take jobs from
us?
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...NM-7WB2c19UhDc...
So, you think that that's the only consideration when giving
foreign
aid? Hardly.
The west is broke! *China owns most of the debt paper. * And they
get
developing country foreign aid. *No wonder you are selling used
clothes.
Too stupid to be an attorney.
So, instead of answering the question about whether or not jobs to
foreign nationals is the only foreign aid consideration, you prefer
a
personal attack. No wonder people don't take people like you
seriously.
Jobs to foreign nationals should be a big black mark about giving
foreign
aid. *We have blown Billions if not trillions on FA without much
return.
You can not buy friends and giving aid to train someone to take the
job
an
American can do is criminal. *Humanitarian aid is one thing, but
giving
monetary aid to the biggest holder of our debt is really stupid.
And
no
one respects you as you never answer a question.
You're wrong. FA is a tiny fraction of our budget, and the rewards are
extensive. You're claiming we give FA to who exactly? China maybe?
Nope!
http://www.vaughns-1-pagers.com/poli...oreign-aid.htm
Nope.. you're wrong:
"The U.S. gave $65 million in 2008, mainly for targeted programs
promoting safe nuclear energy, health, human rights and disaster
relief. The reason Washington gives so little is because it still
maintains the sanctions imposed following the 1989 military crackdown
on pro-democracy demonstrators at Tiananmen Square, said Drew
Thompson, a China expert at the Nixon Center in Washington, D.C."
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...NM-7WB2c19UhDc....
No wonder you flunked out of law school... no research skills.
So, you believe that $65M is significant in the area of Foreign Aid????
No
wonder you're an idiot.
It was you that wrote: "You're claiming we give FA to who exactly?
China maybe? Nope! "
You were wrong. *Idiot.
And, you're claiming that we give a whopping $65M. Do you think that's going
to change the balance of power?
You claimed we gave NOTHING. I proved you wrong. That makes you a
lying idiot.
|