On 24-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

They weren't treaties, treaties have to be ratified by the scum in the
senate. They are merely trade agreements, and can be altered or quashed
at
any time.

really? from the wikipedia site:

In 1988 Canada and the United States signed the Canada-United States
Free Trade Agreement after which the U.S. Congress approved
implementing legislation. The American government then entered into
negotiations with the Mexican government for a similar treaty, and
Canada asked to join the negotiations in order to preserve its
perceived gains under the 1988 deal.[1]

Following diplomatic negotiations dating back to 1986 between the
three nations, the leaders met in San Antonio, Texas, on December 17,
1992, to sign NAFTA. U.S. President George H. W. B

Crap reference and terminology *******ized. The term "trade agreement" is
even used in your Junior High School reference site.

Treaties have specific designation and a record of congress' ratification.

Any agreement can be changed or dissolved at the whim of the slime in DC.

Alternately, "Americans" can walk out of stores, dealerships, when all they
see are products that displaced their opportunities. They won't. Too lazy.
In only 30-40 days, shareholders will demand answers when sales are ZIP.
Refusal to buy overpriced junk would cause marketing companies to resource
to what consumers are willing to purchase.

Consumers can do that, your rulers show NO indication that they will modify
their mistakes.

It's done. Go somewhere there are opportunities like Europe did in the late
18th and first half of the 20th century.