wrote in message
...
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 21:33:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 18:23:30 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Because it is easier to exploit red state workers.

The operative word is "workers". The blue state people were fired when
the plants moved.

?? Completely untrue and at best an exaggeration that has little
meaning.

Tell it to Detroit.

So, the auto industry laid off people who were mostly blue collar are
doing
better than their red state cousins? Are you claiming Michigan is a red
state or blue state? It's so confusing!


A UAW worker in Detroit or Indiana was making twice what a red state
worker makes. That was Harry's point.
Detroit is blue as is most of that area where the big factories were
(Ohio, Indiana, Michigan),
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/

The jobs went to Tennessee, Georgia, Canada or Mexico.
Have you seen the "content" sticker on an "American" car lately?
They are usually about 40-50% American.
If it is a foreign brand, manufactured in the US there still is less
than 50% US content and the assembly will be in a red state.

Nope... get the facts, then type..

http://mediamatters.org/columns/200811250012