In article ,
says...

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:56:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


"Larry" wrote in message
...
Jordon wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:24:08 -0700, "nom=de=plume"

wrote:


"Jordon" wrote in message
...

http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/02/rescue-efforts-underway-after-oil-rig-accident-in-gulf/?hpt=T2


Drill baby drill
Burn baby burn
Lie baby lie


This may actually be an example of the system working.
If the reports are right there were no fatalities and no oil was
spilled. That is better than the normal drive time experience in your
major city. Oil rig worker is a safer job than cab driver

There's a mile-long slick, according the news. An explosion is the
"system working"???

Just because there's oil on the water doesn't mean it came from
the well. I'm sure they have diesel generators on the rig and you
need to store the fuel. The explosion could have blown that up.
There wasn't an explosion or an oil slick. Early reports are often full
of bad information.

As usual, you're the one who's a liar.

http://www.wdsu.com/r/24854300/detail.html


Did you read the article?
"Troedson said Thursday afternoon that Coast Guard boats and aircraft
have not been able to find a sheen."
It was the title of the article

That's nice. The "system" didn't work, however. They're just lucky nobody
died.


Damned unions. Don't care anything about keeping their workforce safe,
just take money from the companies. Oh, wait, I claim here to be a union
hack.