Big surprise in the mail !
On 8/31/2010 4:42 PM, Harry ? wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Harry ?" wrote in message
...
Show us evidence that any part of this story is a lie, DePlume.
Don't have to...
You had your chance.
Have another look. Maybe you'll change your mind.
Show us evidence that any part of this story is a lie, DePlume.
?
Shirley Sherrod... the Rest of the Story
Date: Saturday, August 7, 2010, 4:10 PM
Remember Andrew Breitbart, the media genius and his brilliant
handling of the ACORN 'hooker'. He skillfully manipulated so
that the corrupt media was forced, against its will, to broadcast
corruption in one of Obama's most powerful political support
groups.
But his handing of that affair is nothing compared to his
brilliant manipulation of the Shirley Sherrod 'white farmer'
scandal. It all began last Monday, July 22, 2010. As the
country watched in horror, Breitbart released a snippet of a
tape on his "Big Government" site which showed an obscure
black female official of the Dept. of Agriculture laughing to a
roomful of NAACP members about how she'd discriminated
against a destitute white farmer and refused to give him the
financial aid he desperately needed.
The black woman was Shirley Sherrod - and almost immediately
she became the center of a firestorm of controversy which
exploded throughout the country.
Within a day of the release of that infamous tape, the head of
the Dept. of Agriculture, spurred on by Obama, demanded -
and received - Sherrod's resignation.
Breitbart had won.
But then seemingly Breitbart's actions began to explode in his
face. As Sherrod screamed in protest, FOX News released the
entire text of her speech last March to the NAACP.
And there on tape Sherrod was shown supposedly repenting of
her racism against a white farmer and instead championing his
fight to win funds to keep his farm afloat.
Within hours of that entire tape being revealed, the entire world
turned against Andrew Breitbart. Conservatives throughout the
country were enraged that he'd endangered their reputations by
releasing a 'doctored' tape. Breitbart, they thundered, had dealt
a fatal blow to the conservative media. We all were horrified at
the clumsiness and stupidity of Breitbart in 'doctoring' a tape to
make a supposedly innocent woman look guilty. But now we
discover we have been as guilty of haste to judgment of Breitbart
as the Dept. of Agriculture was of Ms. Sherrod.
Only now can we realize the real purpose for Breitbart's release
of that tape snippet. It was to allow him to cunningly trick the
media into exposing one of the most shocking examples of
corruption in the federal government - a little known legal
case called "Pigford v. Glickman".
"In 1997, 400 African-American farmers sued the United States
Department of Agriculture, alleging that they had been unfairly
denied USDA loans due to racial discrimination during the
period 1983 to 1997."
The case was entitled "Pigford v. Glickman" and in 1999, the
black farmers won their case.
The government agreed to pay each of them as much as $50,000
to settle their claims. But then on February 23, 2010, something
shocking happened in relation to that original judgment: In
Total silence, the USDA agreed to release more funds to
"Pigford". The amount was a staggering...... $1.25 billion.
This was because the original number of plaintiffs - 400 black
farmers - had now.... swollen in a class action suit to include a
total of 86,000 black farmers throughout America . There was
only one teensy problem: The United States of America doesn't
have 86,000 black farmers. According to accurate and totally
verifiable Official USDA 2007 Census census data, the total
number of black farmers throughout America is only 39,697.
Hmmm... by the Official USDA 1992 Census data the US had
only 18,816 black farmers! Oops!
Well, gosh - how on earth did 39,697 explode into the fraudulent
86,000 claims? And how did $50,000 explode into $1.25 billion?
Well, folks, you'll just have to ask the woman who not only
spearheaded this case because of her position in 1997 at the
"Rural Development Leadership Network" but whose family
received the highest single payout (approximately $13 million)
from that action - Shirley Sherrod.
Oops again!
Yes, folks. It appears that Ms. Sherrod had just unwittingly
exposed herself as the perpetrator of one of the biggest fraud
claims in the United States - a fraud enabled solely because she
screamed racism at the government and cowed them into sub-
mission. And it gets even more interesting. Ms. Sherrod has also
exposed the person who aided and abetted her in this race fraud.
As it turns out, the original judgment of "Pigford v. Glickman"
in 1999 only applied to a total of about 16,000 black farmers.
But.... in 2008, a junior US Senator got a law passed to reopen
the case and allow more black farmers to sue for funds. The
Senator was Barack Obama.
Because this law was passed in dead silence and because the
woman responsible for spearheading it was an obscure USDA
official, American taxpayers did not realize that they had just
been forced in the midst of a worldwide depression to pay out
more than $1.25 billion to settle a race claim. But Breitbart
knew. And last Monday, July 22, 2010, he cleverly laid a trap
which Sherrod - and Obama + his cronies- stumbled headfirst
into which has now resulted in the entire world discovering the
existence of this corrupt financial judgment. for Ms. Sherrod?
Well, she's discovering too late that her cry of 'racism' to the
media which was intended to throw the spotlight on Breitbart
has instead thrown that spotlight on herself - and the huge
corruption. Sherrod has vanished from public view.
But the perpetrator of that law passed in dead silence leading to
unlawful claims & corruption... is still trying to fool all of US.
That's the rest of the story, but where is the media?
This is in response to the WSJ article published July 28, 2010:
"Our Divisive President", by Cadell & Schoen,
Two Democrats, on Obama dividing America on race.
Pass along this new information...
Google and read for yourself "Pigford vs. Glickman"
Pigford vs Glickman
My filters must work real good. First evidence I have seen of de-plume
in some time. How many assistants does Michelle have? Grabed this from
the Internet:
Q: Does First Lady Michelle Obama have an "unprecedented" number of
staffers?
A: A spokeswoman for the first lady says that Michelle Obama currently
has a staff of 24. That may indeed be the largest of any first lady, but
Hillary Clinton, with 19 staffers, and Laura Bush with at least 18 and
perhaps more, weren’t far behind.
--
Is government working for you, or are you working for the government?
|