posted to rec.boats
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2010
Posts: 13
|
|
OT La Migra redux
On 8/27/2010 1:55 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Aug 27, 1:41 pm, wrote:
"I am wrote in l-september.org...
In , says...
On 8/27/2010 7:45 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:07:51 -0400, I am
wrote:
In ,
says...
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:03:24 -0400, wrote:
In ,
says...
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:11:35 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:
wrote in message
news
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:11:09 -0400, wrote:
That was the problem in New Orleans. How do you come up with
a
millions bottles of water in a few hours and then do it
again
tomorrow, and then the day after.
It's their fault if they run out. All those banker types need
our
help!!
I was really referring to the problem with supplying New
Orleans after
the storm but I will accept your answer ;-)
Logistics, its all about logistics.
Do you get the winter clothing sent in May or September?
That is why they always say we better expect it to take a week
before
we get any meaningful help from the outside world. You can't
really
stockpile supplies locally because nobody knows where the storm
will
hit until after it does. NOAA guesses are still only 5 days out
max.
You also need to stockpile the supplies away from the areas that
will
need them. You don't want your warehouse blown up in the storm.
It
takes a while to mobilize the transport for this stuff.
And, all of this is the responsibility of the poor who are living
day-to-day. Basically, that's what you're saying.
I am just saying it is beyond the capability of any government to
show
up in 4 hours (or even 40 hours) with a million bottles of water.
That
seemed to be what everyone expected
It is amazing the number of people who are so helpless and want to
stay
helpless.
It's called a lack of personal responsibility. The liberals *need*
them to be
helpless so they can continue to pretend they're holding out the
hand of help.
It's not really the liberals that subscribe to this, it's the
progressives like harry, bonnie, pubic etc.
I make no distinction. 'Progressive' is just a name liberals adopted
because
'liberal' leaves a bad taste in the mouths of so many people.
There is a huge difference...
What is it?
Well, Liberals are peace loving and tolerant.. More toward the
Liberation side of the road, kind of a community based politics where
everyone is equal and important. Progressives are more the the socialist
side of the road with an intolerant and elitist bent. Divisive to the
community, they survive by creating a "ruling class" and a tax slave
class. They hold power by creating a divide and using any crisis or
extreme to create anxiety between those classes, their most effective
tool is racism, progressives are extremely racist and intolerant in
general.. Liberals are not...
Do some reading, start with Roosevelt and Wilson... 
--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese!
You have no idea what you're talking about.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I have seen your posts, this one above is typical. Nothing, air,
empty... I am sure you didn't bother reading up on what I suggested,
At the same time I am sure you really don't care, it's just a lead up
to you calling somebody a racist or a moron... I am not interested..
What readings did you suggest?
|