BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

bpuharic

On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:44:31 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:28:09 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:39:42 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:19:59 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Which would have been avoided if we had concentrated on Afg. to begin with
and stuck with it.

We would just have more body bags from Afghanistan.

didnt have many body bags after 9/11

Invading Afghanistan had little to do with that. The covert forces had
cut off Bin Laden and made him totally ineffective within a month.
Once we pushed him into Kandahar and cut him off from his money and
his contacts he stopped being a threat.

which is irrelevant to the fact the taliban were complicit in an act
of fascist imperialist aggression against the US

more goalpost moving.

These guys are getting better about putting things they want to keep
so far underground that bombs don't work.

there are ways to handle that. ever hear of a dolphin submarine?
The SSKs?

How does a sub attack a nuclear plant built inside a mountain?

what weapons do you think a sub can carry?