On 8/18/2010 4:18 PM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 18, 7:10 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:00:00 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
On Aug 18, 6:27 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:19:02 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
On Aug 18, 6:17 pm, wrote:
Thought you might like this little tidbit…..
Under direct orders from President Obama, the USAID will now
contribute $36MM to train 3000 IT workers in Sri Lanka! That’s right,
Sri Lanka!
I wonder how many other “Initiatives” have been pledged to the myriad
of other countries to OUTSOURCE or SURPLANT US JOBS?
Just thought you would like to know who's really screwing the "middle
class".
In case you want to call BS...
http://www.informationweek.com/news/...on/showArticle....
ah. direct orders from obama??
uh...where in the article did it say obama ordered this?
because it DOESNT. there's NO indication obama knows ANYTHING about
this.
"a federal agency run by a hand-picked Obama appointee has launched a
$36 million program to train workers, including 3,000 specialists in
IT and related functions, in South Asia."
nope. no indication obama ordered it.
bob, you just keep amazing me with your lack of comprehension. This
is his administration, under his watch, his hand-picked appointee,
it's HIS deal. "The buck stops here", remember? BO is exporting
10,000 jobs to Sri Lanka. Period.
so his hand picked appointee did this. obama did not order it
so you lied? is that what you're saying?
"The buck stops here." Everything that happens during his
administration is his fault. Those are your rules from the Bush
years.
Liberal-dimwits want it both ways. The day Bush was in, it was all his
fault. But the day Obama is in it is still Bush's fault. Been over 18
monhs now for Obama, plenty of time to make changes.
Besides, are you saying that BO doesn't know what his hand-picked
appointees are doing? He doesn't know what's going on in his own
administration? He doesn't intend to live up to his promise? Just
what the hell *is* he doing? He's the appointee's BOSS!!
He might not, Obama does not strike me as being that smart But does
know how to BS good. But like most liberals, denial is inherinat,
always an excuse or someone else fault.
"While Obama acknowledged that occupations such as garment making
don't add much value to the U.S. economy, he argued relentlessly
during his presidential run that lawmakers needed to do more to keep
hi-tech jobs in IT, biological sciences, and green energy in the
country."
Not much he can do but to fix the whole environment. You can't
subsidize a who economy for long. Bottom line is to address why the US
economy sucks. And it comes down to overhead costs, inefficiencies in
government, taxation, courts and lawsuits and more. Even corporate
corruption and unions have a part on why the US (and Canada) is on a slide.
"He also accused the Bush administration of creating tax loopholes
that made it easier for U.S. companies to place work offshore in low-
cost countries. "
Hm, never understood that claim by the left at all.
"As recently as Monday, Obama, speaking at a Democratic fundraiser in
Atlanta, boasted about his efforts to reduce offshoring. The President
said he's implemented "a plan that’s focused on making our middle
class more secure and our country more competitive in the long run --
so that the jobs and industries of the future aren’t all going to
China and India, but are being created right here in the United States
of America."
Funny, if he wants the middle class more secure why is he saddling them
with record amounts of debt and blowing huge sums of money to corrupt
corporations?
So is he lying!! His administration is ENCOURAGING offshoring!! Are
you saying it's OK for him to not do what he said he would? It's OK
for him to be two-faced?
Yep, Obama is a liar. We have seen him say one thing and do another
often already. Sure sign the weasel can't tell the truth. Two faced is
a good descriptor.
Wow, you've evidently lost all faith in the guy. Welcome to the real
world. :-
Yep.
The worst thing about Obama, is he has the power and position to make it
better but is one clueless idiot or a traitor.
--
Is government working for you, or are you working for the government?