On Aug 17, 5:48*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:28:01 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

That is NOT what you've been saying. *You said: "what percentage of
this (increase) was accounted for by a growth in dual
income families? *There actually is a DECREASE in dual-income
families, which limited the observed INCREASE in income!!

??WTF? can you read? no one said...and no reference says...there has
been *a DECREASE in dual income families. *in addition to being stupid
are you illiterate?

Except your own link:
"While household income has *increased*, its growth has been slowed
by
a *decrease* in married-couple households who tend to have two
earners
and, therefore, higher incomes.

What about "a *decrease* in married-couple households who tend to have
two earners" does your dumb ass not understand? From YOUR OWN LINK!!

Seriously bob, you're mental. Deranged. Retarded.

cya