"Harry @ news.east.earthlink.net" wrote in message
...
On 8/10/10 9:00 AM, John H wrote:
On Aug 9, 5:59 pm, wrote:
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:12:51 -0400, "Harry @ news.east.earthlink.net"



wrote:
On 8/9/10 5:08 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 08:00:19 -0400, "Harry @ news.east.earthlink.net"
wrote:

In effect, a large part of our political class is showing its
priorities: given the choice between asking the richest 2 percent or
so
of Americans to go back to paying the tax rates they paid during the
Clinton-era boom, or allowing the nation's foundations to crumble -
literally in the case of roads, figuratively in the case of
education -
they're choosing the latter.

not only that, but we're borrowing to finance the gifts for the rich

Once again, 49% federal tax rates for all income over $250,000, and
*every* dollar coming in in any way, except for long-term capital gains
on investments made in the United States, should be considered income.

another article the other day pointed out that the richest 1% have
seen their effective tax rates drop by 50% in the last 10 years.

this country is getting more like mexico every day

Hey pubhic, you think none of those rich are Dems? What a f'ing joke
you are. If the liberals had their way, we'd have a government just
like Mexico's, with those in power having all the wealth. When will
you liberals wake up?


If I had my way, you and all the other white racist ****kickers would be
shipped to mexico with a sign around your head saying, "I hate Latinos."



You have too much guano in your diet.

--
The OBAMA motto: We've got what it takes, to take what you've got!