wrote in message
...
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 15:03:41 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

defamation was not by Breitbart anyway. He is just the one who posted
the excerpts of the tape on his blog. The first thing they have to
prove is that he saw the whole tape. I have not heard that he was the
one who selected the excerpts, only that he posted them.

Nope. Don't have to prove he saw the whole tape. They have to prove he
willfully misrepresented her words.

If that is the test, Vilsack belongs in the dock too.

?? Vilsack didn't publish the lie.