posted to rec.boats
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,578
|
|
ot The End of Men
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Jul 28, 6:23 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Jul 28, 1:32 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Jul 28, 9:42 am, Harry? wrote:
In article ,
says...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Larry" wrote in message
m...
lil abner wrote:
good grief
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/...d-of-men/8135/
The government will have to increase taxes to compensate for
all
of
these
lower paid women....
You'll have to grow a pair to intimidate a woman.
~~ Snerk ~~
Tell it like it is, sister!
You too, my bow legged little sister!
A society run entirely by women would quickly starve or simply be
conquered. A society run by men only would be pointless.
Bzzzt...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazons
Biology encourages women to be conservative nest builders. Biology
encourages some men to be innovative because they cannot get sex any
other way. Thus, without men, there would be very little new
technology, without new technology, the world will starve.
The interesting question is therefor, "Does society need the typical
"teamwork type" of successful male anymore or will the innovative
individualistic males become the dominant model? Male worker drones
are obsolete while male innovators are a necessity.
It might "encourage" since men don't give birth, but other than that
we're
just as if not more capable than men. Sounds like you're not very
comfortable around either group.
Nom should learn to distinguish between legend and reality. Her/his
post provides more evidence of my assertions.
Your post provides conclusive evidence that you're a moron.
If Nom is actually an attorney, any reasonable person would wonder how
he/she passed law school, a ringer perhaps? Nom is clearly incapable
of rational thought.
If you were a real man... oh wait, that's not actually possible.
|