Boaters vs Desert Folks
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Jul 28, 2:13 pm, Jim wrote:
Pass the popcorn.
The liberal San Francisco (sanctuary city for lawbreakers)9th Circuit
Court, on the bay full of boaters.
Versus
The people of arid Arizona beset by the expense and crime brought upon
by illegal immigrants preying upon their state.
The issues:
1. Does Federal immigration law have relevance in the U.S.A., if those
laws can be breached with impunity?
2. What rights do states have to defend themselves from foreign invasion
when the Federal Government lays down?
3. Is a country with no borders a "country?"
4. If Mexicans were black Jamaicans and wouldn't cut grass or wash
dishes or clean house real cheap for well-off "middle class" Democrats
and Republicans who are too lazy or stupid to do those chores
themselves, and want cheap restaurant staff because they don't even
really know how to cook anymore, would there even be an "illegal
immigration problem?"
(This might be stated as: Is it okay to be an "economic" racist if it's
just a Mexican wetback? Hell, he's illegal anyway, right?)
Jim - Those questions need answering. Being a boater I recuse myself
from judgment in the matter.
Libs do not pay taxes and so will not pay to enforce fed laws except
when it is in their interest. IF AZ ignores the fed judge and
enforces their own laws, how would the feds enforce the ruling? Care
to predict where the American people stand on this? Does the Obama
admin with their extremely low approval rating really want to go down
this road? Now the fun begins.
You're a bozo.
|