On 7/22/10 8:51 PM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:51:44 -0400, Harry wrote:

On 7/22/10 4:27 PM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:50:39 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


"JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"justwaitafrekinminute@gma il.com wrote in message
...
On Jul 22, 11:05 am, wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...
jps wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:38:26 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"I am wrote in message
...
Listening to Rachael Maddow talking about how "FOX news is not
news",
and getting on them for showing video of reverse racism.. Funny
coming
from MSNBC with 4 viewers and the lowest credibility rate of any
minority media....

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese!
Not funny. You're an idiot.

Actually, I'm astonished your head didn't explode if you actually
watched Maddow. So kudos to you!

His opinion is informed by the wingnut media. There's no way he
watched the show, it was more likely cited by one of his news
sources.

"Reverse racism." This is what he calls a black person who is a
racist. Nevermind the footage was taken out of context and the
segment was a part of a larger story that focused on becoming an
enlighted advocate on behalf of poor people rather than black or
white.

These people are little, petty humans. The freak is just one example
of their rampant stupidity.

Looks like President Obama and USDA head Tom Vilsack think Fox News is
News.
The Fox reporting was all it took for them call this woman numerous
times as she was traveling in Georgia, and make her actually pull off
the road to text in her resignation.
So somebody believes Fox "news."

Jim - Politicians are real suckers, ain't they?

And, they have since apologized and offered her a job. Clearly, they
screwed up, but they admitted it. That's not what the last guy in the
White House would have done.

Suckers: NAACP, White House, USDA.

Losers: Breitbart, Fox "News" Channel motormouth fools. Breitbart is
destroyed in polite society, and Fox is a laughing stock. Even their
prime "News" guy, Bret Baier, got caught lying.

Winners: Ms. Sherrod, CNN, Shep Smith of Fox "News" Channel (wouldn't
run the story)

Here's the timeline:http://mediamatters.org/research/201007220004

I happened to be watching CNN when Tony Harris first interviewed
Sherrod, and Mrs. Spooner called in.
I expected a typical mea culpa and had already come to believe Sherrod
was a typical minor league black racist. I've known enough of them.
What a shock when Mrs. Spooner called in and said Sherrod saved her farm
and was a friend to her. And the look of joy on Ms. Sherrod's face at
that unexpected vindication brought tears to my eyes.
Compelling real time journalism.
At that moment I knew more about the truth than the NAACP, the White
House, all of Fox "News" and anybody else who wasn't lucky enough to see
that Tony Harris interview live and get the FACTS.
That's what real journalism is about.

Jim - Sometimes you get lucky. Sometimes you don't.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hummm, how do we know that "Mrs. Spooner" is the "one" Sherrod was
talking about there. With her decades of racist comments and activity,
do you really doubt she "didn't help" other white farmers? You don't
really know and to take these changing stories and cover my ass
statements from the Whitehouse and DOA, you would have to be a fool...

Not to mention, the minoriry media's timeline, is a lie, a complete
fabrication... O'Reilly, who is a commentator already did a mea culpa
in the intro to his show last night, more than Maddow or Olbermann do
when they are caught lying every night...

As usual, you're completely full of it, and you're a racist.

He's predisposed to stupidity. Can't help himself. Don't hate him
for what God made him.



i don't recall encountering anyone in real life who works as hard as
"Tosk" does to *prove* his intellectual laziness, stupidity, and ignorance.

Ingersoll is a ... cipher.

Well, it's one thing we can account to Snotty that requires hard work.

And, all that industry certainly pays dividends, doesn't it?

Think he's collecting unemployment or just welfare benefits?


Well, I'd guess no to UC. One has to be able to prove one had and lost a
job.