On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:03:21 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:28:37 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:04:59 -0400, Larry wrote:

John H wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 23:10:30 -0400, wrote:


On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 19:46:34 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:


http://screen.yahoo.com/funds.html


and here is where you're confused. 401K's are managed by fund
managers...the funds they manage CAN do pretty well on an individual
basis. yet, unless you're a full time manager yourself, you have NO
idea which ones these are going to be.


Move your $40 to a money market fund and STFU.

You'd think all the Limo Liberals here would get up a collection for poor
bpuharic


notice how the right ignores the situation facing the middle class?

the rich are doing fine...so that's all that matters

Seriously, Bob, do you really think all the conservatives here, or anywhere, are
rich? Do you not think a bunch of us might be middle class? Yet you are the one
doing all the whining because you paid little attention to your investment.

I asked if your 401K had a money market fund. By putting your money in same, you
could have prevented the losses you took.

Don't they all? If he has/had a company match - it would be free money,
too!

I've noticed he won't answer a straightforward question.

you call it straightforward

i call it useless

Well, did your 401K have a money market, or not.

Simple question. If you lost all your money through negiligence, when a money
market was readily available, then you shouldn't be blaming anyone but yourself.

It's called 'personal responsibility'.

Of course, to a liberal them's fightin' words.
--

John H