wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:15:27 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:07:53 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Arizona has no business determining immigration policy. It's a federal
issue.


The problem is the feds are not doping their job. As we have said
several times here, states are already enforcing immigration laws. It
is particularly true in Florida. I can't speak for others because I
don't live there. This US v AZ is just a political move to get votes
for the democrats in the mid term. The US is going to lose the case.

I believe MMS was doping just fine.

Huh?

Your post had a small typo.

There's a difference between ENFORCEMENT and creating new laws. New laws
are
the domain of the Fed in this case. There are lots of things that the Fed
screws up. That doesn't give states license to be creatively making new
law.

There are thousands of state laws that mirror federal law., Are you
saying a state can't have a law against kidnapping?

No. I'm saying that AZ created a new law that doesn't just mirror Fed law.

You can't even make a 14th amendment case since you do not have the
right to violate federal law.

They usurped Federal law. That's a no-no.

I'm glad you're able to predict the future. Can you tell us who'll be
replacing Scalia?

I have been pretty good at predicting the future so far. I did say
Goldman would come out of their case OK. They ended up copping to
admitting they might have had better disclosure and gave the
government part of what they made on the deal.