On 7/11/10 11:29 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/07/2010 8:52 AM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/11/10 10:49 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/07/2010 6:25 AM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/11/10 8:23 AM, John H wrote:

More crap.

It isn't crap. Obama captured the racist vote and got elected. What is
hard to understand about that.

Was Obama a war hero? Nope.
Did Obama do anything really notable before being elected? Nope.
Has Obama ran his own sucessful business? Nope
Any background in economics? Nope.
His tenature in the state riddled with corruption. Yep.

So how did he get the vote?

He got a lot of the vote because his opponent was just this side of
senility, and his opponent's running mate was and is an uninformed moron.

I do not count service to the country as a negative in a president.
Usually people who believe having prior military experience is a
detriment are themselves cowards and selfish ignorant types. No balls.

Actually, it is a hugely positive to have military service. Less ivory
tower idealism gets to theater if the president has a clue. And Obama is
clueless.

So you think Obama, never raised in American until 12, knows little of
US armed forces, makes a suitable leader of the the US war machine?

Do you let your kids boat without training too?


I don't believe McCain's "military experience" counts for much in the
21st century, and he wussed out big time in torture, considering he
was tortured.

The biggest albatross around his neck may have been Sarah Palin. While
she motivated "the base" of the GOP, she's such a ninny, she turned off
a lot of voters. As she will in 2012 if she is dumb enough to make a go
of it.