"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 00:41:17 -0400, wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 23:32:27 -0400, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 20:11:26 -0400, "Harold'"
wrote:
These whores will do anything to stay in uniform.
Last time I checked O'Bama was the whore in charge.
you pro terrorism?
Afghanistan has very little to do with terrorism. There may be less
than 100 al queda in Afghanistan and we are spending about 100 million
dollars a year each to try to kill them.
how many al qaida do you need to launch a terrorist attack? how many
taliban sympathizers in govt do you need to provide a base (look up
the translation of 'al qaida)?
This is a stupid way to waste our grand kid's money at a time when the
country is in so much fiscal trouble.
what would be more stupid is to allow another 9/11
Al queda has moved out. we have even less chance of securing the borders
there than we do here.
If we'd have said "Hey Mr. Taliban, if you hear some loud noises around Tora
Bora, don't worry about it, just us coming in to "get some" for 9/11. Just
letting you know so that you stay out of the line of fire."
And then seriously going after that scum instead of going after the sitting
government and half assing the assaullt on al queda when they were all in a
cluster, we would be much better off than we are today.
You don't have to beknowledgeable in military history to know that taking
over a country is the easy part- holding a country is much harder, just ask
anyone that has played the game "Risk".
To me, taking over Afghanistan made as much sense as the rumors of that big
weather changing machine tha USAF is supposed to have causing the Haiti
earthquakes so that the US could take over the country. Who the hell in his
or her right mind would want either country?