Jim - wrote:

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Silence...as expected.


Stuff the hook a little deeper into the bait.

Nobody *knows* how or what Al Gore would have done. Why argue about it?



Duh, my point exactly. So why place the blame on GBW unless you can definitively state
what things Al Gore would have done differently.


There is a theory around that states 9-11, while planned for some time,
was actually launched as payback on Bush for at least two reasons:

1. He is the son of Bush I, who "besmirched" Saudi Arabia by placing
U.S. troops on "holy" Saudi soil, and,

2. Bush II stated he was not going to "engage" in the Israeli/so-called
Palestinian peace talks and, in fact, he did nothing for more than a
year into his reign to get engaged. This absolutely infuriated many in
the Arab/Moslem world, who were hoping a U.S. president would continued
to press concessions upon the Israelis as the price for peace.

You may not like this theory, but there may well be some merit to it.

There also is some conjecture Bush knew 9-11 was coming, and did
virtually nothing to stop it.

Bush certainly turned the events into political hay for his failing
administration.


* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.