BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

Canuck57[_9_]

On 24/06/2010 11:38 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Harry" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:04:45 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

I hear being a general under Obama is a short term career job.

so was being a general under truman

and remember general shinseki, under bush?

Guess he might as well polish up the fishing rods and go fishing.

notice he never complains about the rich white frat boy who screwed
this whole thing up?

Bush fired or "retired" many generals for speaking out. I think
Obama
should not fire him unless he believes that McCrystall can no
longer do
the job he was assigned to do.

Obama's ego will cause McCrystal to be fired.

He is a thin skinned little man, isn't he?

Actually, you short ****, several presidents have fired there generals
for less. Truman/McArthur, Lincoln fired several before finding Grant,
Johnson fired Lemay, McKinley fired Lemay, etc.

Bush fired Shinseki for telling the truth at a congressional hearing
where he was under oath. Does that count?

We will see, hasn't Obama done two generals? All the same I think Obama
be plotting a judge next.

Clearly the man things like Chavez that he has no limits. Going to be
nice to see Obama fall when he goes too far.

--
The bigger government gets, the more it tends to rule out common sense.