On 23/06/2010 9:09 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 23/06/2010 3:03 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Harold" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Moose" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:04:45 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


I hear being a general under Obama is a short term career job.

so was being a general under truman

and remember general shinseki, under bush?


Guess he might as well polish up the fishing rods and go fishing.

notice he never complains about the rich white frat boy who screwed
this whole thing up?


Bush fired or "retired" many generals for speaking out. I think
Obama should not fire him unless he believes that McCrystall can no
longer do the job he was assigned to do.


Obama's ego will cause McCrystal to be fired.


Your ego needs to be self-inflated to compensate for your obvious
lack of intelligence.


Was he fired or not, Dippy?


He was fires for insubordination, as opposed to what Bush did... fire
people for stating facts, Dufus.

He resigned, probably was put to him, resign with full pension or I
will fire you for my ego and cause you pension grief.

He chose wisely and resigned.

--
The bigger government gets, the more it tends to rule out common sense.

He didn't have a choice. He was told to resign. He follows orders.
You're an idiot.

Guess Obama is now also going to have to fire a judge saying even the
Obama must follow due process.

Obama is an arrogant big mouth ass hole.

--
The bigger government gets, the more it tends to rule out common sense.