BoatBanter.com - View Single Post - It all makes perfect sense when..........

D.Duck[_5_]

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:49:17 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:57:19 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:30:33 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 14:48:49 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

And Bush inherited the war from Clinton who inherited it from Bush.
Your point?

nope. number of troops in iraq under clinton?

zero.

number of US dead in iraq under clinton?

zero.

amount of money spent on the iraq war under clinton?

zero

try again, rush boy.

You must have been stoned during the 90. Do you vaguely remember the
No Fly Zones?

gee. number of troops on the ground? zero

thanks AGAIN for proving me right

number of US troops killed:

zero.

golly, do you often argue against your own position like this?

you keep proving i'm right. thanks. i already knew that

As I said, the Germans did not have any troops in England in 1940
either, were they at war?

number of troops killed by clinton in iraq

zero

thanks for proving me right

We flew sortees over Iraq every day, regularly bombing them.

uh no. the no fly zones were zones where the iraqi airforce was
prohibited from entering. we didn't bomb anyone.

Were you not paying attention? As part of these air patrols we would
shoot at every RADAR that illuminated any of our planes

number of US troops killed: zero

and this was an INTERNATIONAL effort PAID for by the UN. it didn't
cost us anything

bush spent a TRILLION.

It happened a lot and every time we killed somebody.
It was hoped that this would only be some poor RADAR operator but the
Iraqis said we also killed a lot of civilians. Granted Saddam put
these in residential areas but that did not keep us from shooting
HARMs at them.

I know, tough ****, they are just collateral damage.

so saddam killed his own people

thanks. i already knew that

The cost was billions. There were Air National Guard and Regular Air
Force units rotating through Iraq for almost 10 years .

courtesy of an international alliance. that wasnbt the US alone. were
you stoned during the 90's?

The same alliance that gave Bush the go ahead to invade. I was wide
awake. Remember those UN resolutions?

gee. seems the UN disagrees with you. certainly bush interpreted the
UN resolutions that way

after he lied to the UN about WMD's.

and how many did he find there?

oh. none

and yet you focus on obama as if he caused all of these problems and
is uniquely corrupt.

You aren't even awake.
I have consistently said this was a 19 year war involving 4
presidents.

no, you haven't. you h avent mentioned that at all. not a word.

you ONLY mention obama. never bush.

and number of troops killed by clinton:

zero

you're right. i dont give a **** about the afghans and the iraqis. for
one simple reason: i am not a racist

That doesn't compute. You like blacks but hate central Asians. Still
racism.

?? where did you learn your english?

try to learn a few ideas, OK? YOU are a kluxer. YOU hate blacks. YOU
despise the idea a black is pres of the US.

me? i have an indifference to iraqis and afghanis. i dont hate them
at all. they have their lives, i have mine. unfortunately they insist
they want to kill me because i'm not muslim

that's their misfortune.

so YOU hate blacks

I am indifferent to iraqis or afghanis

therefore YOU are the racist

YOU seem to think you know better than they do how to run their
countries and their cultures. me? i say let 'em alone. if they want to
kill each other it's none of my business. they're as smart as i am

you? you have the great white father view. you're gonna go in and
force the natives to obey the great white man.

that's racist

I want us to come home, how does that make anything you said true. You
are just talking gibberish now.

because you're sitting here trying to justify bush's murder of 4400 US
troops and a trillion wasted...comparing it to an international
intervention by clinton

number of US troops killed by clinton in iraq: zero

dollars spent: zero

by bush: 4400 US troops dead

a trillion spent

so tell me how that's clinton's fault, OK?

for a right winger you seem to be a craven coward.

You are awful "brave" with our kid's lives

and you're willing to let evil run rampant as long as the rich are
protected. seems the only time you'll commit lives is in the service
of the rich

Yet you didn't think saddam was evil, amazing.

that's why we probably have a trident sub sitting 500 miles off
pakistan

That is how WWIII would start. Great plan.

really? pakistan has a missile that can reach the US?

got anyh proof?

They don't need a missile. A boat in New York harbor, the Potomac

??you seem to ignore the fact there wont be a pakistan if we hit them
with a trident sub's missiles

DO try to stay on top of things, OK? you just keep embarrassing
yoruself

River or Long Beach would do just fine. The Afghanis are smuggling
tons of heroin into this country every year. A couple hundred pound
bomb would be trivial.

and they would do that BEFORE we nuked them, just as they did in 9/11

you, however, are a craven coward and would just whimper and take it.
typical chickenhawk.

The only thing that continually comes through in your comments is that you
believe everyone that disagrees with what Obama has done is that they are
racist. How do reach that conclusion or is it just wishful thinking on your
part.

What would your comments (excuses) be if the current POTUS was white
Anglo-Saxon and made the exact same decisions as Obama? And don't say the
opposition would disappear.