On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:00:51 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 13/06/2010 6:53 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:41:45 -0600,
wrote:

The Challenger report indicated that the pace of job losses edged
slightly higher in May, as employers announced plans to cut 38,810
jobs from their payrolls.

This was 1.3 percent more than the four-year low of 38,326 job cuts
announced in April, but 65 percent lower than one year earlier, when
planned job cuts totalled 111,182.

Does not mater how you cu it, it is bad news.

better than it was a year ago. you just want an excuse to blame the
darkie president


so the rate of job loss has DROPPED 65% vs a year ago.

That is like saying I gushed 6 pints of blood and don't have as much to
blead any more.

or that the bleeding has slowed...and the patient is recovering.


if that's failure, i'll take it.

Yep, for 3 trillion in debt I expected better.

of course you would. he's black. he CANT do right by you.

Or about 30,000 per
working citizen of debt. How long can that go on before we declare USA
bankrupt?

we did OK in ww2 with a larger debt.


If not for Obama part time low wage jobs, 15,000,000 unemplyed would be
15.411,000 unemployed. Putting real unemployment over 10%.

Long term unemployed unchanged at 6.8 million.

ah. so the rate of job loss has dropped to ZERO. that's ALOT better
than the legacy of your rich white buddy bush which saw unemployment
rocket from 4.7% to 10%

With over 95% of the new hires part time government employees....

glad you focus on 1 data point? me? i take a longer term view. latest
data shows private industry is starting to hire


You think that is good news?

Not sustainable. But is a fast road to bankruptcy.

tell it to truman.