"Le Moose" wrote in message
...
On 6/9/2010 12:22 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Jun 8, 6:48 pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch





wrote:
On Jun 8, 6:05 pm, Jeddadiah Smith wrote:
On 6/8/2010 3:55 PM, jps wrote:

You sound like an asshole.

I am, brother.

I do see a substantial bit of hypocrisy here from someone who is a
liberal but somehow has enough to spend $100K on a sailboat while
having a luxury car and two mortgages.Seems that somebody is making
too much money according to Obama. Most attorneys are dems because
the dems never favor tort reform. Basically attorneys are taking
money out of the pockets of the poor and giving it to the rich.

Having gotten that rant out of my system I will not discuss it more
but will stick to discussing the sailboat. Big mono-hulls are a poor
investment but a catamaran depreciates slower. You will also have
more places to keep her in shallow water. I believe that integrated
over time that a catamaran is safer than a mono because it allows you
to get into shallow water thru questionable inlets or into shallow
anchorages that are well protected during storms.

It's so damned funny to watch you "conservatives" squirm when you find
out a liberal can be well founded and still speak on behalf of those
who haven't a voice.

We don't bitch about paying our fair share. There's still plenty left
over to live, sometimes even comfortably.

Limousine liberals don't bitch about paying their fair share... they
just don't pay it, period. The rest of the liberal voting base has
their hand out, as they don't pay *any* taxes. They wait on the limo
libs to give them a hand-out paid for by, of course, the working
class.

It's no secret.

Well, which one am I? I think you've got some reality issues. I suppose
you're going to claim that rightwing nuts want to pay for their fair
share?

Take your pick. It's all part of OUR problem.

Poor little man. You have a problem. Bummer for you!