"A.Boater" wrote in message
...

On 4-Jun-2010, Frogwatch wrote:

REP. ALAN GRAYSON (D-FL) wants Repubs sent to prison for supporting
drilling but he can start with me (although I am not repub) and I'll
make him look as foolish as he is.
MY beaches (Yes MINE as I am a 5th gen Florida native) used to be
pristine and clear of condos and I could walk them without some idjit
yankee telling me it belongs to him. There used to be salt marshes
that produced crabs and redfish but they were filled for development
spurred by tourism. I used to be able to walk into the sand dunes to
a sheltered spot and build a fire and see the glory of the night sky,
now the dunes were levelled for hotels and the night sky is nothing
but neon. Given a choice between tar balls and tourism, there is no
doubt, I'd take the tar balls. Oil jobs pay well, tourism pays
minimum wage. Once condos foul the beaches, it is effectively forever
whereas the oil will be gone soon enough. I'd go so far as to believe
that tourists with their suntan grease have probably put more oil in
MY beach sand than BP will.

Listen, dumbass, it is all about the money. You were entrepreneurs,
trickle
down conservative businessmen. You made billions. You could have kept the
pristine beaches, but you took the money. They aren't YOUR beaches any
more.
You took your pieces of silver and sold the beaches to the condo builders.
Better tax base, more money, growth, prosperity. You know, all that crap.
Remember running all those tree huggers out of town because they wanted to
stand in the way of progress and keep the dunes? Dumbass.

Same thing with BIG OIL money. You took the money, now they get to oil up
the condo owner's beaches. You'd better treat them right, they are all you
have left.

So, dumbass, count your money and STFU.

PS
You'll never know what tourism would pay because you have taken you pieces
of silver and destroyed the Florida that people would pay to see. All you
have left is Mickey and that isn't much. Dumbass.

Your answer was better than mine...