On 6/3/10 7:59 AM, Tim wrote:
On Jun 3, 6:53 am, wrote:
On 6/3/10 7:38 AM, Tim wrote:

On Jun 3, 5:12 am, wrote:
On 6/2/10 11:39 PM, Tim wrote:

That's profound, Harry, Now tell us about your next boating adventure.
You have your other Parker for a long time,t hen traded for a
different one. how long to you plan to keep this one?

Until I get tired of it.

I had the 25' Parker from 2003 to 2008, and bought the present 21'
Parker in 2008.

Just out of curiosity, why did you down size from a 25 to a 21?

In no particular order:

While Chesapeake Bay can get mighty choppy, it isn't a challenging or
dangerous body of water, and I tend not to go out when the waves are
three feet high or larger, so I didn't need a big fishing boat.

Because the usual seating position in a pilothouse boat is so far
forward, in a hard chop you feel it because you are in the part of the
boat that is pounding. On my 21 footer the seating is farther back, on
the part of the boat that does not leave the water while slamming
through chop.

I always scrub out the entire boat after using it. That took an hour
plus on the 25 footer, and only takes about 20 minutes on the open
center console.

The 21-footer burns about half the gas per hour at cruise that the
larger Parker burned.

I can launch and retrieve the 21-footer in my sleep. The larger boat
took a lot more effort, even though I could do it by myself.



Yeah, I can see the advantages because the 25 wasn't a mere 4 ft.
longer. It was dimensionally a lot bigger boat all around. Now that
you explained it, I can understand why.

23 is as big as I'll go on a V-bottom for that reason. I did have a 27
and for one to launch it wasn't easy . not easy at all.


If you added in the swim platform and pulpit, the 25' Parker was about
32' long overall, and 9'6" wide, amidships, and fully found, weighed
over 7000 pounds. Also, the 21-footer is a deep vee; the 25 was a mod vee.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.