Thread: What should be the practical consequence of the "consideration" Goowants us to give to animals' lives?
View Single Post
  #7   Report Post  
posted to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.zen,alt.philosophy.zen,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.boats
Fred C. Dobbs[_2_] Fred C. Dobbs[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2010
Posts: 4
Default What should be the practical consequence of the "consideration"Goo wants us to give to animals' lives?
On 5/14/2010 7:52 AM, oxtail wrote:
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:

On 5/14/2010 4:58 AM, Mr.Cumstain lied:
On May 13, 8:11 pm, "Fred C. wrote:
On 5/13/2010 6:35 PM, Mr.Smartypants wrote:
"Fred C. Dobbs" wrote:

The only GOOBER here is

****wit David Harrison - THE Goober.

Using animals for food is unhealthy

No, it isn't.

Liar.

Nope. There is nothing inherently unhealthful - not "unhealthy", you
****ing **** - about eating meat.

and just plain WRONG.

No, it isn't.

Idiot.

Nope. It absolutely is *not* wrong.


There seems to be something inherently unhealthy
about being full of anger and hatred.

Yes, there is. That's why "vegans" are so impossible.


--
Any more lip out of you and I'll haul off and let you have it...if you
know what's good for you, you won't monkey around with Fred C. Dobbs
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote