On 09/05/2010 12:32 PM, Jim wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 09/05/2010 11:02 AM, Jim wrote:
BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...
Fairly competent resources are available off-shore for 1/4 to 1/3 the
cost of US resources without all of the bagage of hiring a US
resource. In fact you can hire 2 for 1 US worker and not still be
ahead if the productivity is only 50% each.

Correction "2 for 1 US worker and still be ahead"

Plain stupid thinking.
Those working will have to support those not working.
Or get their throats cut. Is that what you mean by "a head?"
You sound like a commie. In America we want everybody working.
Your "foreigner first" attitude don't fly.

That is why it is a depression. Fewer people supporting the increasing
dead weight and more corruption too. A loose-loose situation. Why even
get involved? You would have to be nuts to open a new business in the
US/Canada that could be done offshore where win-win is possible.


That'll work for misfits who don't fit into normal society, and don't
care about making it better by getting people working.
Is that what you mean?

Jim - The end result of Libertarianism is Communism. The Libertarian
leadership become the apparatchiks. These closet commies ain't fooling
anybody. That's why they never get anywhere in America.
They don't have American values. They're commie faggots.
The GOP knows this. Even the queer Demoncrats know it.

Huh? Libertarianism is about less government, less interferance, more
choices and opportunities for the people will to get off their asses,
state owns squat. How does that equate with communism?


It's about power. Got nothing to do with "government."
It's always about power.
Libertarians problem with interference is they don't want anybody
interfering with them interfering with others. Same as the commies.
You don't get it, do you?

Jim - Hard to believe how some folks just don't get it.

Nope I don't. Some libertarians are anarchists, I am not that far into
that. Just want government to pave roads, enforce common law, do K12
schools and after that, nothing much is of real value. If the country
needs defending, let the militia loose. We don't need GM, Citi
bailouts, we don't need Iraq/Afganistan with our nose in places just to
be a target shoot. We don't need a bureaucracy bigger than most cities
playing ponzi politics at out expense. Any time any organization gets
too much control over peoples lives bad things happen. World wars, tax
slavery, wealth robbing and strife with starvation.

But you are right, ultimately it is about power. Keep them poor, hard
working and always chasing the carrot. Easier to manage the herd that way.

Try a quiz.

http://www.theadvocates.org/quizp/index.html

Me, I hit top right on the results chart.

Then retake the test looking at how government is behaving, not the big
mount Obama talk, how they are actually behaving.

Enlightening.

US Governemnt answers would be:

Government Censorship: D - because Obama has actually done this and
they have the power to stall sotries.

Military service volunary. A for governemnt as it is the standing law
to let the rich kids off the hook.

Drugs a M because it depends if it can be controlled and taxed. Weed
will grow in home gardens, not acceptable but alchol...tax it.

RE sex, a lot of laws exist on the books although probaly weakly
enforced, a M

National ID, A, but they would rather see RFID in you cranium.

No Corporate welfare, so a D. Government loves the corruption it provides.

Goverments love trade barriers, so D here.

Control their own retirement, hanus, governemnt loves to skim it. D

Governement loves voting buying, charity is D.

Cut goveernment, the government sin of all time, D.

You get a fracking statism-marxist result. (Leftist-statism)








--
There is a sucker born every minute, liberals and our politicians are
counting on it.