On Sun, 09 May 2010 10:51:45 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/05/2010 10:23 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 09 May 2010 09:17:07 -0600,
wrote:

On 09/05/2010 8:29 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 09 May 2010 08:20:11 -0600,
wrote:

your problem is the only fact you care about is the fact
unemployment's not at 25%. you have blinders on

Actually, i would like unemployment to be 3%

except, of course, the economic policies you push would drive
unemployment to 25%.

Mine have never been tried, the closest would be Reaganomics

sure they were tried. in 29 they let the banks fail, as you desire. it
drove unemployment to 25%

.. It would
differ in that I would downsize 1/3rd of the governemnt to match as not
to increase debt by too much.

govt represents 20% of GDP. cutting 1/3 of that would drop the GDP by
7%....which is about the amount of GDP drop that led to the current
depression

so you're saying you'd cause a depression to cure a depression?

yep. that sounds very right wing.


I would stop the Afganistan/Iraq issue ASAP

that's because you're a coward. the iraq war is useless. but you're a
coward and think only of money so dont even appreciate the heroic
sacrifice CANADIANS are making against fascist imperialist aggression
in afghanistan


In 2 years, the USA will become the hottest growing economy going.

really? when the GDP drops 7%...like it just did...that led to a
depression

what we need are tax cuts for the middle class. that's something not a
single right winger has proposed

we need a tax increase on the wealthy...another thing the right
opposes

Instead of wasting trillions on GM, banks and losers, I would put some
towards nuclear power plants employing people across the nation equally
and have something to show for it. And it would cost a fraction fo the
bailoouts.

why? oil represents 8% of power generation. and building nukes would
take 20 years.


You wouldn't see me shooting off my mouth too much, as I would be a man
of action and not big mouth bull****. I would gve your results and not
gums a flapping.

what i notice is that you ignore the problem. we need to regulate wall
street. you ignore wall street because of the rich. we need to
regulate financial instruments. you ignore them

you ignore the problem...the real problem. the fact is, until wall
street greed caused the economic collapse, govt spending was not a
huge problem.

the real problem is the collapse in middel class spending caused by
the rich stealing the wealth of the middle class

you whine, bitch and moan about the darkie in the white house. you
blame main street for the collapse

your whole philosophy is right wing...which is why it's a failure


Saddly some misguided ones are. But I am a conservative-libertarian.
And I believe in peoples rights to seek out prosperity. If they get off
their asses, it is up to them. A president first and formost needs to
preserve what made America great. And that isn't jive talk bull**** we
get today.

more right wing bull****. the problem is NOT a lazy middle class.
americans already work more than any other people on earth in
industrialized countries

you right whiners want us to be slaves


Obamanomics is a bust, an utter failure

you mean because the economy is growing? strange definition of failure
you have. guess you forgot that bush spent us into a depression and
spent a trillion on a useless war

Proof it isn't inflation? Funny, I see no jobs, increasing taxes and
stagnent wages. Some types of bankruptcies are at an all time high.

you see no jobs?

guess you dont follow the news. for the first time since 2006 the
economy added jobs.

and stagnant wages?? IT'S BEEN THAT WAY FOR 10 YEARS! a whole DECADE
when the middle class had NO increase in wages while the richest 1%
had a THREE HUNDRED PERCENT INCREASE in income.

yet you say NOTHING about that.

you right whiners...you focus on the bull****, penalize the middle
class, insulate the rich from their mistakes THEN BITCH BITCH BITCH
about the LAZY MIDDLE CLASS

all you do is BITCH BITCH BITCH


. Sad joke on Americans. DC
corruption gone mad. Obama has almost already spent about what Reagan
and Bush spent in 16 years but did it in 2!

guess you don't know what happens during a depression, do you?
figures. right whiners value ideology over facts

I have read all about 1929 to 1939. That is why I know it isn't going
to end soon. Statism and liberal selfish *******s need to learn the
basic leasons first. And only now are some waking up to smell, better
get the government in fiscal order or Greece will infect NY.

like i said. you have NO idea what happens during a depression

hey idiot...do me a favor

tell me when in the last 80 years the govt ran a surplus during a
depression, OK

otherwise just stop pumping out the fairy tale right wing bull****


Huh? Do you subscribe to bull**** economics?

Employment always gets better in 30-60 days. Maybe 4 months if it is
like Intel still selling chips out of production for 8 months, but it is
rare. Employment is real recovery.

really?

it takes a full YEAR of economic growth at 5% to reduce unemployment
by 1%

but you're so full of right wing bull**** you think rush limball is a
hero