On 5/6/2010 10:52 AM, hk wrote:
On 5/6/10 10:41 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On May 5, 2:35 pm, wrote:
On 5/5/10 2:31 PM, Loogypicker wrote:





On May 5, 1:48 pm, wrote:
On 5/5/10 1:36 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On May 5, 12:53 pm, wrote:

I'm still waiting for you to forward the departmental name and phone
number of the law enforcement agency in your area you claim has a
warrant with my name on it. I want to give the info to a criminal
lawyer
in your area who happens to be an in-law of mine.

Put up or shut up, ****head.

I'm still waiting for that alleged Yale degree, fireboat welcome and
lobsta boat.

There's no warrant. You know it and I know it. It's just another of
your
made-up stories.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another
name.

What there is none of is your alleged Yale degree, fireboat welcome
and lobsta boat. Show me those, and I'll show you the goods on
YOU.....how's that? Pretty easy, huh?

Your claim was checked in your local area by my lawyer in-law, ****head.
There's nothing behind it but your big mouth and your big mouth lies.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another
name.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Bull****. Who did this alleged "lawyer in law" contact? What county or
city? Once again, if you're so sure of yourself, show me even ONE of
these allegations and I'll give you the goods on your pending law


Ask your non-existent lawyer how a law clerk who works for a successful
criminal law lawyer does a wants and warrants search is done in a major
metro area, especially when no crime has been committed.


Was "lawyer in law"
Is "law clerk in law"
I think that's the sort of stumbling around and getting caught in lies,
that Mr. Loogie was aludeing to.
Have a nice day. Ta Ta