On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:06:32 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 23/04/2010 4:16 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:42:33 -0600,
wrote:


Now if you lose 5% or 7% purchasing power over a working career, I doubt
anyone would argue that it would buy a boat... right?

After all given Democat/Obama debt-spending is at record levels, bailing
out the inept, lazy, corrupt comes at a cost right?

actually they're protecting jobs. to the right, that's
unforgiveable...protecting the middle class. we should only protect
the rich

Only if you are in denialism. Corrupt auto jobs were lost a long time
ago. While GM was getting bailouts for it's inept business model, other
companies were laying off as GM was producing subsidized vehicles. In
2009 GM recieved over $60,000 per vehicle it made to stay in business.

What Obamanites don't want to admit is by keeping GM alive, how many
Toyota, Ford, Honda and others were laid off? How many lost their jobs
because of people worried about pending tax hikes to fund this
Obamanation?

You complain about "rich". Well how come Obama hasn't cahrged on single
executive, accountant or anyone with the GM fraud? Even though a court
has rules GM mistated financials like Enron and SOX laws exist, Obama
isn't charging anyone.

Going after Goldman, just PR to look like he is doing something. But as
per usual, just a big mouth on a soap box selling more debt-spend.

and the biggest spender in history was george bush

Right about now that shifts to Obama. Certainly by the end of the year
Obama will have racked more debt that Bush. In fact, by the end of 2010
Obama will hold the two top debtor years in American history, 2009 and 2010.

You're overtaking Froggy in the "Insane Poster of 2010" race for the
uncured.

Froggy better stop ****in' around on that boat and get back to his
regularly scheduled lunacy or you'll leave him in your very small
wake.