On 23/04/2010 5:39 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 23/04/2010 5:02 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/23/10 6:56 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 23/04/2010 4:41 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/23/10 6:16 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 23/04/2010 3:26 PM, hk wrote:

The funny thing is, he thought that when I mentioned the "damage
caused
by eight years of Bush..." I was referring to overspending. I wasn't.

So what is taking Obama so long to fix it? Is Obama still letting Bush
run the government?


This is a serious question: are you retarded?

Are you in denialism of who has be el presidente for the last 16 months?

Denialism is a mental disorder. Hey, maybe we should all work for Obama
and surf the Internet all day. Think, you could get paid by Obama with
benefits to do this.


You think eight years of messes can be cleaned up in 16 months?

First, I don't think much went wrong for 7 of 8 years of Bush. Democrats
and Repulicans told him to go to war, he did.

You're an idiot.

Congress decided debt was good, and wanted cheap easy debt being they are
liberal debtors and lowered the cost of debt too much. Congress manages
the money supply, look to democrat congress for who screwed up.

You're an idiot.

Congress wanted cheap easy debt and created the debt bubble. Blame Bush
all you want, but debt is congress and it has been democriters ball game.

You're an idiot.

I think I summed that up nicely.

Sorry your brain didn't grasp the fundimentals. But no one ever accused
you of being rational.

--
Socialism and statism are great as long as someone else pays for it.