On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 07:05:38 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 21/04/2010 4:21 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:50:53 -0600,
wrote:


ever hear of a filibuster? you aren't up on american politics. i'd
stay out of it if i were you; you might get hurt.

You fail civics? So you can filibuster but it stops nothing.

anybody believe that? anybody? bueller? bueller?

again you know zip about american politics.


investigate the SEC for investigating goldman sachs....

Funny, SEC didn't investigate Obama's buddies at GM, Chrysler, Fannie,
Freddie etc. either.

how many investigations at once? and none of them, except fannie mae,
had an effect on the financial meltdown.

How about like Itally did wih the mafia, 300 at once.

But this government is selective, more like 1935 Germany

more godwin's law hysteria

the rich white boy, bush, threw americans into prision without trial.

the darkie gives middle class people healthcare and the racist canuck
thinks he's a nazi

.. I wonder what
Goldman did to tick off Obama?

the same thing it did to 100,000,000 americans. it damn near
bankrupted us.

but they're rich. so you would gladly eat their ****


you mean because the GOP is now taking orders from wall street? of
course, they always have. that's why they met behind closed doors with
25 representatives of some of the biggest wall street hedge funds
recently

You mean like the Dems took orders from UAW and banks?

the UAW represents american workers

how many american workers earn a billion dollars like the CEO of
goldman sachs?

It was a
democrat congress who created TARP and didn't see any dems complain when
it was misappropriated to corrupt auto.

actually it was alan greenspan, henry paulson, etc. who recommended
it..and they worked for bush

remember paulson's famous edict that he wanted a trillion dollars to
spend ONLY as he saw fit?

typical rich white boy idea.


Now you have Government Motors lobbiests donating government money to
senators and congress people to get elected. Slight conflict of
interest here, government paying for representations advertising. Too
bad you can't see what is wrong with that.

and we have wall street meeting behind closed doors with the GOP to
tell 'em what to do.


Democriters are at least as corrupt, perhaps more as trillions of debt
are being spent on buddies.

i have no doubt the dems are corrupt. the american electoral system
leaves 'em no choice. but at least they've proposed to regulate wall
street instead of sucking their tits


yep. it should be MUCH easier to pierce the corporate veil. the ruling
elite makes it too easy to escape responsibility

You want to put a dent into corporate corruption, you will need to start
by fixing governemnt corruption first. Pretty clear Obama is not going
to prosecut fellow Harvard types like Wagoner for misrepresentation of
GM financials.

gee...more proof you dont know **** about US politics.

the SCOTUS...at least the conservatives...ruled that corporations
could give as much money as they wanted.

so conservatives have ruled that corporate america...not the
voters...run the US.



oh, and any politicians included in voting for bailouts that have
mysteriously benefited from contributions, hang them for treason.

bailouts were necessary. unfortunately. but we dont have to let it
happen again

No they are not, that is a myth used on the weak minded.

really?

ever hear of the great depression? that was YOUR solutoin.

how'd it work out?