On 17/04/2010 5:18 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 17/04/2010 11:22 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:00:42 -0700, "Bill McKee"

wrote:


wrote in message
news On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:19:19 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

"Get your kicks, on route 66"

?;^ )

Only on the days that April 15 is not on a weekend.

Has shared his birthday with the tax man all his life?

No wonder he hates government.


I don't hate government. I hate the idea of 60% of the population
working
for
the government, while the other 40% draw welfare.
--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v


Stop pulling numbers from your rear end. While the US gov't is the
biggest
employer, both state and fed gov'ts combined employ about 8%. If you add
the
Post Office, it bumps it up slightly (add 2 million). If you add
education,
it ends up about 17% or so.

Here are two links. Feel free to ignore them.

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_perce...ent_employ ed

http://www.heartland.org/policybot/r... dy_Says.html

Those are old numbers.

Fact is, working non-government signifigant tax paying people are a
minority in the USA and Canada. That is why they are enslaved tax
servants of the majority.

The number I have is of those paying more than $3000 in taxes, not working
for government and currently employed is about the 100M mark.

So 230M people outvote the working tax slave by over 2:1.

Now that tells us why losers, debtors and government realy want to screw
he working taxpayer.

--
The Liberal way, take no responsibility.


You're an idiot. John claimed that 60% are "working for the government."
That's complete hogwash. Taxes have gone DOWN under Obama. Feel free to
continue to make a fool out of yourself.

Agreed if that was the case. It isn't 60%. But it is 1 in 7 of working
class, excluding those on welfare etc. But if you add in businesses
that survive because of goverment bloat, could be 1 in 5. That is a
pretty high load.

Fact is, less than 1/3 of the population is contributing economic
wealth. The reset are not.

But if you said 60% would get global government health care benefits but
not actively contribute to government health care, you would be about
right, or perhaps a little low. Which is why Obamanomics will fail.

Taxes haven't gone down unless you lost a job and now have one that pays
less thus less taxes. That isn't something Obama wants made public.

Take this chart:

http://portalseven.com/banks/Failed_Banks_List_2010.jsp

When Obama should have raised interest rates to reflect more income for
risk to the banks, he lowered them. Well, it crashes the banks. Self
induced by government liberal debt-money management.

Lets face it, all the Obama BS in the world isn't going to change what
has happened. Workers are getting sucked dry from fat government.

--
Time to ask ask, is our government serving us or are we serving the
government?