View Single Post
  #90   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
nom=de=plume nom=de=plume is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Pilot error, and Brunswick pays 3.8 mil.

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:34:26 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:50:30 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
m...
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:58:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

If you want some light reading take a peek
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-...4pcs. txt.pdf


I couldn't get the link to work... I seriously doubt one's home would
be
required to have an energy star label like my fridge does.

The link works, you may have just not waited long enough for it to
load.
... and "energy star label" is exactly the language they use. I doubt
it means you have to put a sticker on the door but you will have a
notation on your title deed.



I'll try again later. There's already tons of paperwork required for a
sale... all sorts of disclosure statements. It's likely the same bs.

This is going to be a huge bureaucracy coming up around energy
savings. The states will have to hire a bunch of federally certified
inspectors and if they refuse or are unable the feds will step in and
bill the residents accordingly. I got an Email that makes this bill
sound worse than it is but in trying to wade through it, I find plenty
of troubling things. This is another brick of paper one person could
barely pick up. It may be years before we really understand the
ramifications of it. (much like that H,R 4577 we are arguing about)



I think I'll withhold judgement until I read some of the facts from
organizations dedicated to dissecting such things.


Actually if you have an opinion it is time to contact your senator
although I understand this is probably DOA in the senate



Hmm... well, that was said of the healthcare bill, but if it is DOA, then
why is it so disturbing?

--
Nom=de=Plume