On 4/12/10 2:47 PM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 12, 2:26 pm, wrote:
On 4/12/10 2:24 PM, Frogwatch wrote:





On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote:

wrote in message

...
On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote:

wrote in message

...

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400,
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I
do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.

Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.

--
Nom=de=Plume-
Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.

The next post will prove my point.

I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Point proven, Jack.

Yeah, that you're a stalker.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom-
de-fraud

What? Loogy is a woman, and so are the packs of righties who hide behind
anonymous IDs.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

We'll see in a few weeks. Oh, and is your real name hk, lady?


You aren't going to show up here. There's no reason for you to do so. If
you showed up and started any trouble, you'd end up in the slammer...or
worse.

..

--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym