On 09/04/2010 5:36 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/9/10 7:16 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 09/04/2010 6:58 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/9/10 8:51 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 08/04/2010 6:42 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 8, 5:40 pm, wrote:
On 08/04/2010 11:29 AM, Frogwatch wrote:

On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, wrote:
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:

Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Every now and then, even HK makes sense.

Agreed.

Might fine looking women for sure.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

What the hell was I supposed to have lied about? Typical irrational
female.

Didn't think you were lying at all. But females are an emotional
part of
the species.


Are you implying men are not emotional? If so, that is an absurdity.

Nope, just that the fair sex is generally more emotional.



Men and women are about equally emotional. Women, I believe, tend to be
more emotional about issues that matter - family, food, shelter,
relationships, schools, healthcare. Men tend to be emotional about
bull**** - machismo, warmongering, sports, cars, et cetera.

Don't get me wrong, it wasn't meant as a criticism at all. But a nice
balance is possible. Sometimes you need to be hard, sometimes you need
to be soft... working mariages both work together and listen to each
others concerns in earnest, then act as one.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.