On 08/04/2010 11:31 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 08/04/2010 6:03 AM, thunder wrote:
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:58:54 -0600, Canuck57 wrote:


Agreed. Going for the little guy is stupid. Even though that is what
will happen.

Get the CEO, make him personally pay out of his own pocket $20,000,000
to the families without being re-imbursed by the company. And the
company match the payout to the families for another $20,000,000.

If they complain, double it.

If they still want to fight it, lay down criminal negligence carges on
top of it with jail time for the senior executives and board members.

Then there will be progress.

Or learn from the Chinese, and execute the CEOs. Fines just don't cut
it, when 25 are dead.

True. One think I will say about Chinese justice, it is harsh and not
corrupt. The crap that goes on here, would not occur there. Wagoner of
GM fame for example, he wouldn't have gotten a pension. He would have
been begging for his life for stiffing all the lenders. And he would have
been executed as a mercy act.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.


China's legal system not corrupt???? Yeah, those show trials are just for
our benefit. They're really humanitarians deep down.


Would I say no corruption, never. But do they transfer private
corporation debt to taxpayers and bailout losers... Nope. You get
caught swindling over there, no pensions like Wagoner got. In China
Wagoner would have likely been shot for operating a company fraudulantly.

Humanitarianism against corruption does not work.
--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.