On Apr 8, 1:58*pm, hk wrote:
On 4/8/10 1:53 PM, Loogypicker wrote:





On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, *wrote:
*wrote in message

....
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, *wrote:

Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym
More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I
doubt it.

Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read
an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the
magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly
airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes).

--
Nom=de=Plume

How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at
all about me???

Whoosh!

You're so stupid you didn't get it. What a surprise.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pssst, dummy, did you notice that she directed the statement at ME???
Hence, she's implying that I somehow was saying something about
(drumroll please) ME. I wasn't. It was a simple comment about your
obsession with things you can't have. Anyone with any sense can see by
your utter disdain for anyone that has things that you can't have, and
by your lies about things that you claim to have or have done that you
have this mental problem.