View Single Post
  #26   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
nom=de=plume nom=de=plume is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Health care for the poor

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 07/04/2010 4:37 AM, anon-e-moose wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 06/04/2010 11:31 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

How to pay for it? Here is a good way, reduce federal salaries to
the
same level as comparable pvt jobs saving roughly $100 billion each
year which would be used to finance health insurance for the poor.
Federal salaries are roughly 1.5X as high as comparable pvt jobs.
Use
this data:
http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs041.htm#earnings
to arrive at the figure of about $49 billion directly saved and then
tack on another $49 billuion for benefits and pensions and then
divide
by 10 million uninsured.


Yeah, we don't need to attact talented people to run the gov't, so
don't
pay them very much. Makes a lot of sense.

You have similar effects as the ipecacuanha plant on normal thinking
people.

Sorry. I'm bozo binning you for health reasons. No offense?


Please don't read my posts... please!!


Only if you don't read ours!

If the dingbat doesn't want us reading her dribble, why does she post it
in the first place?


Operative word for sure, dingbat.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.



In your case: idiot.

--
Nom=de=Plume