wrote in message
...
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:52:27 -0500, Jim wrote:

wrote:


You don't know what you're about. My statement about Beck's treatment
of the subject was based on Jim's synopsis, giving Jim the benefit of
the doubt in the accuracy of his summary, as any 'cogent' reader could
have assessed. You need to troll elsewhere.

My synopsis was accurate.
And your judgment that deplum is trolling is also correct.
Your last sentence is opinion.
The trolls and spoofers aren't so easily stopped.
Can't even say I encourage your attempts on that score, as it is a
futile pastime, and generally just adds to the din, besides ending up
with a chinese food affliction to the mind.
But I must say that you and Canuck57 certainly raise the level of
discourse beyond that seen in the Harry and Loogy mutual butt-sniffing
dialogs, or the similar deplum/TopBass saga.
It's your call of course.

Jim - Just trying to make sense of it all myself.

The Usenet world and I know that she's trolling. I make the
occasional comment, and she makes daily sweeps through the NG taking
potshots, often desultory and incoherent, across the spectrum for who
knows what purpose. I enjoy a good debate. I don't enjoy nonsense.
It's as though its a competition for who can submit the most acerbic
nonsense between JPS, De Plume, and Harry. What's amusing in this,
though, is that they all seem to think they're the creme de la creme
of thinkers, and this in the face of the constant enfilade of informal
fallacies they employ in almost every note. Too, De Plume engaged me
in this thread and she calls me a troll? How ironic.


Whoooo ... suddenly the "intellectual" giant decides he speaks for all of
Usenet. Wow. I take it back. You're not a troll. You're just another idiot.

--
Nom=de=Plume