On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:51:06 -0700, jps wrote:

On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:20:18 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:25:30 -0700, jps wrote:

On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:46:29 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
om...
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:28:37 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:gjrkr55s5l3fkpucrkpu08j7bpl4ujf9eg@4ax .com...
On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:54:28 -0500, Jim wrote:

wrote:
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:57:49 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:55:43 -0400, bpuharic
wrote:

On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 18:19:46 -0700, jps
wrote:

Maybe the world's young people are finally getting the message.

CAPE TOWN, South Africa - South Africa's far-right leader Eugene
Terreblanche who campaigned for a separate white homeland was
murdered
on Saturday on his farm, the SAPA news agency reported.
he should have moved to texas. they would have made him governor.
Too late for him now, fortunately.

The cruel irony is that Progressivism is so...malevolent.

You've hit on the key that most here won't understand.
Glenn Beck has done an in-depth analysis of Progressivism.
He has laid out its evils in detail, using film, music and
the simple but effective blackboard.
Logically mapping the progress of this insanity known as
"Progressivism," he has shown it for what it it.
Evil.
Not the innocent "political movement" portrayed in "scholarly" books
and
encyclopedias.
Those depictions are done by "progressives" and are deceptive and
self-serving, which is part and parcel of progressive evil.
The hallmark characteristic of any evil is its ability to disguise
its
malevolence in the mask of benevolence and fairness.
Some of us - you, me, my sister and Glenn at minimum - can see
through
the mask.
Too bad usenet is not conducive to use of the blackboard, but alas,
it
is not. And fat chance of getting the libs to watch Glenn, a kind
and
benevolent man who has been unjustifiably pilloried by the main
stream
media in an attempt to minimize the audience he can speak the truth
to.

Jim - Glenn Beck fan.


I have no doubt that Beck has given the subject a thorough treatment.

Now that's extremely funny. And, I think you're serious.

I don't watch television, and subsequently I don't watch Beck. My
observation (and obviously you're aware of the same hypocrisy) is
based on the malicious contempt that JPS, and others who adhere to
the
Progressive ideaology, display for other human beings, especially
those that they deem to be politically opposed. As far as I'm
concerned Progressivism, as its displayed by its representatives in
this group, is to be scorned.

Then, you go on to contradict yourself... you don't watch TV/Beck, but
you
have no doubt....

You are quite the (pseudo) intellectual!

You don't know what you're about. My statement about Beck's treatment
of the subject was based on Jim's synopsis, giving Jim the benefit of
the doubt in the accuracy of his summary, as any 'cogent' reader could
have assessed. You need to troll elsewhere.


Because Jim deserves, as one can easily observe, the benefit of the
doubt.
Right. You're the troll. Or, perhaps more accurately, a shill for
Beck/Rush.

I think I'll stay right here for now.

Jesus of Insurance doesn't know that Jim isn't Jim but just a parody.
But that's plenty good enough for him, 'cause parodies fit right into
JoI's view of reality. Good, righteous Christians pretend all the
time.

I'm sure it's good for the insurance business.

The question of Jim's sincerity or identity is irrelevant.


In your mind, certainly.

Yes, I read the Onion and Fox News' website with exactly the same
expectations, knowing that they're both parodies with a tenuous link
to reality.

To the argument, not to the person.