|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,596
|
|
Bliues deny coverage to ill newborn baby
On 30/03/2010 12:21 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"I am wrote in message
...
In ,
says...
On 30/03/2010 4:14 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:50:52 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:45:26 -0400,
wrote:
That works so well for welfare. Breeding more deadbeats and getting
others to pay for it ****es me off. Now you want to add a whole new
level? Welfare checks *and* free health care?
how about welfare for wall street?
you right wingers.....i laugh when i read you because it's obvious
your abso-****in-lutely clueless
I am against that also. Why does Obama give Wall Street all they
want?
because george bush and other rich, white frat boys, rigged the system
so we have no choice. it's either bail out the rich or let the banking
system go down in flames...like in 29.
that's why the banks are fighting so hard against regulation. and why
people like richard shelby, GOP of alabama...are carrying their water
for them. protect the rich
You seem to forget it was democrat congress that created TARP and Obama
was all for it. In fact, he spent the his share (and then some) once in
office.
Funny how the liars here and in the media forget that fact..
Like you? TARP wasn't "created" by Congress. It was passed by Congress. It
was created by Treasury (i.e., Paulson) and was promoted to Congress as
make-or-break funding to stabilize the economy, which, after some revisions
did as advertised.
You are arguing semantecs. If DEMOCRAT congress didn't approve the TARP
it would have DIED. Fact is, democrats like large sums of unaccountable
cash.
--
--------------
Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.
|